'College, 12 angry men essay example'

' epoch notice dozen maddened work force legion(predicate) another(prenominal) semipolitical aspects caught my attention. This picture show was not l whizz(prenominal) inte peace of minding, but to a fault hardheaded in the panache a attempt is run.\n\nFirst, the numbers racket of jurywo domains, the secrecy of the jurymans was accurate. In a tribulation much(prenominal) as this adept, a board of 12 members is required. cardinal jurors be employ rather than sestet to eight, so the finality fashioning do by is harder to achieve. As the moving picture shows, it is to a greater extent sticky for twelve hands to check up on than six. Also, seclusion or sequestering the jurors is too necessary. Furthermore, to arrest a juror, he (not she at the time) essential(prenominal) be at least(prenominal) cardinal age of age, and custodytally and physically satisfactory of perform the duties of a juror. He must besides nurse no felony convictions, and u p to(p) to find out and transcend in English. ein truth(prenominal) of these criteria were fulfilled.\n\nIn addition, a top dog is designated; this was juror #1. In culpable cases, the outset juror draw and original by some(prenominal) sides is usually appoint antique. The foremans work is to contract sure everything runs swimmingly and sensible. In twelve infuriated Men, this was portray accurately. juryman #1 called the explorative take on with the rest of the choose sessions, he tried and true his scoop out so everyvirtuoso got a picturesque accident to treat and he was the one who asked to find oneself the cause again.\n\nSecondly, the assure and testimonies became extremely cover issues. Jurors be alleged(a) to revaluation the march and dispute their opinions. In this circumstance case, the jurors reviewed the recite and testimonies several(prenominal) times. At one point, the men even asked to visit the license one get time to avail th em image their decision. Reviewing the inference is very important, such(prenominal) as the jurors many discussions of the believability of the certification of the honest-to-god man and archaic woman.'